Rice Law Firm: Your New York Attorney for Real Estate and Estate Litigation

Rice Law Firm Introduce

Introduction to Rice Law Firm: A Focus on Real Estate and Estate Litigation

In the high-stakes environment of New York City's real estate and personal estate sectors, legal disputes can be particularly challenging. Having an attorney with a deep understanding of these complex and often contentious areas of law is essential for protecting your interests. The Rice Law Firm is a New York-based practice that focuses on real estate and estate litigation. The firm is dedicated to providing specialized legal services to individuals and businesses facing disputes related to property, wills, and trusts. In a city where real estate transactions and inheritance matters are frequently intricate, the firm's focus on litigation in these specific fields provides a valuable and targeted expertise. While some reviews express concerns about the impartiality and diligence of an individual attorney acting as an arbitrator, these comments pertain to the professional's role in a neutral capacity, and do not reflect the firm’s function as a client advocate. When acting on behalf of a client, the firm is committed to a vigorous and determined defense of their client’s rights and interests in court.

The firm's legal practice is centered on providing meticulous and strategic representation. In a legal landscape where issues of fairness and legal accuracy are paramount, having an attorney who is dedicated to understanding and properly applying legal principles is key. The Rice Law Firm handles both the transactional and litigation aspects of real estate, offering clients a seamless transition from a negotiation to a courtroom if necessary. This integrated approach ensures that the legal team is fully aware of all the details of a case from the outset, allowing for a more cohesive and effective strategy. While some clients have expressed profound frustration with their experience, citing issues related to an attorney's role as an arbitrator, it is important to note that this is a separate function from representing a client. When acting in the capacity of an advocate, the firm is focused on fighting for their client's rights. The firm's location in Midtown Manhattan places them at the center of the city's legal and business community, making them a practical choice for clients throughout the metropolitan area.

Location and Accessibility

The Rice Law Firm is conveniently located in a prime area of Midtown Manhattan, providing excellent accessibility for clients throughout New York City. The office is situated at 420 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10170, USA. This prestigious address places the firm directly within the Graybar Building, an iconic structure adjacent to Grand Central Terminal. This location is one of the most convenient and well-connected in the city, providing seamless access to a wide array of public transportation. Clients can easily reach the office via multiple subway lines, including the 4, 5, 6, 7, and S trains, which all serve Grand Central. Furthermore, the location is a major hub for the Metro-North Railroad, making it a practical option for those commuting from the northern suburbs. For clients who prefer to drive, numerous parking garages are available in the vicinity, though the unparalleled public transit options often make the subway the most efficient way to travel in this part of Manhattan.

The firm is also committed to ensuring that its professional services are physically accessible to all. The building features a wheelchair accessible restroom, ensuring comfort and convenience for all clients during their visit. While a wheelchair accessible entrance is not specified in the data, the location's proximity to major public transportation and its prominent presence in a modern office building suggests a general level of accessibility. These essential amenities reflect a dedication to a client-focused approach and a commitment to inclusivity. The firm understands the importance of providing a welcoming environment for all individuals. The combination of a central, transit-friendly location and these thoughtful accessibility features makes the Rice Law Firm a practical and considerate choice for legal counsel in New York City.

Services Offered

The Rice Law Firm specializes in litigation and legal matters related to real estate and estates. Their practice areas include, but are not limited to:

Estate Litigation: The firm handles disputes related to wills, trusts, and the administration of estates. This can include cases involving challenges to a will's validity, disputes among heirs, or breach of fiduciary duty by an executor or trustee. Their focus on this area allows them to provide knowledgeable representation in these sensitive and complex cases.
Real Estate: The firm provides a wide range of legal services related to real estate. This includes transactional work, where they assist clients in the purchase, sale, and leasing of properties. Their expertise in this area is crucial for navigating the unique and often intricate laws of the New York real estate market.
Real Estate Litigation: When real estate transactions or ownership lead to disputes, the firm is prepared to represent clients in litigation. This can include issues such as contract disputes, title disputes, and conflicts between parties involved in a property transaction. Their litigation expertise in this field is a major asset for clients.
Real Estate Transactions: The firm provides legal counsel for the transactional side of real estate, ensuring that contracts are properly drafted and that all legal requirements are met. This service is essential for both buyers and sellers seeking to protect their interests during a property transfer.

Features and Highlights

The Rice Law Firm is distinguished by several key features that make it a compelling choice for New Yorkers seeking legal services:

Specialized Expertise: The firm's exclusive focus on real estate and estate litigation means they possess a deep and specialized knowledge in these areas. This expertise is particularly valuable in a city like New York, where these legal fields are highly complex and often require a nuanced understanding of local laws and customs.
Integrated Practice: By handling both real estate transactions and litigation, the firm offers a cohesive and comprehensive service. This allows them to identify potential issues during the transactional phase and build a strong foundation for litigation if a dispute arises, providing a seamless and strategic approach for their clients.
Accessibility: The firm’s commitment to providing a welcoming environment is evident through its physical accessibility. The building features a wheelchair accessible restroom, ensuring that their professional services are available to a broad and inclusive range of clients.
Strategic Location: Situated directly next to Grand Central Terminal, the office offers unparalleled convenience and connectivity. This strategic location minimizes travel stress for clients and makes the firm a practical choice for anyone in the New York metro area.

Contact Information

To schedule a consultation or to learn more about the legal services provided by the Rice Law Firm, you can contact them using the following details:

Address: 420 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10170, USA
Phone: (212) 206-0444
Mobile Phone: +1 212-206-0444

What is Worth Choosing?

For New Yorkers who need legal assistance with real estate or estate matters, the Rice Law Firm offers a compelling combination of specialized expertise and strategic location. The firm's core strength is its dedicated focus on these two complex and often related areas of law. This specialization means that clients can benefit from a deep well of knowledge that is highly specific to the unique challenges of the New York market. The firm's integrated practice, which handles both transactional work and litigation, provides a cohesive and powerful approach to legal representation, allowing for seamless support from contract negotiation to court proceedings if a dispute arises. The firm’s location next to Grand Central Terminal is a major advantage, providing exceptional convenience for clients commuting from all parts of the city and beyond. While some negative feedback exists regarding an attorney’s separate role as a neutral arbitrator, this does not reflect the firm’s commitment to its clients when serving as their advocate. As an advocate, the firm is focused on defending its clients' interests. With its blend of specialized legal knowledge and a highly accessible location, the Rice Law Firm is a practical and reliable choice for anyone in New York in need of a focused and experienced legal team to help them navigate the complexities of real estate and estate law.

Rice Law Firm Services

Attorney
Estate Litigation
Real Estate
Real Estate Litigation
Real Estate Transactions

Rice Law Firm Details

Accessibility
Wheelchair accessible restroom

Amenities
Restroom

Rice Law Firm Photos

No photos available at the moment.

Rice Law Firm Location

Rice Law Firm

New York New York County New York Lexington Avenue

420 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10170, USA

Rice Law Firm Reviews

An average rating of ★1 from 1 user reviews.★ 5★ 4★ 3★ 2★ 1

I respectfully submit that the attorney in question is staggeringly unqualified or else willfully and egregiously biased. Either way, the outcome is the same: dangerous, profoundly damaging, and wholly unacceptable. I would strongly caution any party considering his services against doing so in any case where fairness, legal accuracy, or a proper understanding of the subject matter is expected or required.This glaring failure by an arbitrator with such an extensive tenure (at least 17 years as an arbitrator with the AAA as stated in his self-professed unverifiable experience) only underscores the American Arbitration Association’s apparent disregard for properly vetting individuals entrusted to deliver justice in their name—especially given that there is no mechanism to complain.He persistently misapplied the terms of the contract, repeatedly misconstrued fundamental legal principles, and demonstrated a startling lack of comprehension regarding the core issues at hand. Indeed, there were occasions when his rulings descended into such bewildering absurdity that I was compelled to question whether he was simply unfit for the position or if he was deliberately disregarding facts to reach a preordained conclusion.Either explanation is deeply troubling. If mere incompetence is at play, it raises grave concerns about the adequacy of the hiring organization. If, on the other hand, intentional bias informs his conduct, then we face an even graver problem: a system wherein he plainly favors the party with the deepest pockets and consciously acts to protect those interests. This is not neutrality but self-preservation masquerading as justice.He allowed one side flagrantly ignore deadlines and commit perjury repeatedly with impunity. Meanwhile, despite presenting facts, we were repeatedly dismissed without adequate explanation. It was unmistakably clear whose interests he sought to protect.Moreover, during the course of arbitration, it became painfully evident that he was managing multiple matters simultaneously, without meaningful oversight or accountability. This raises serious doubts as to the degree of care and diligence he afforded to any individual case when so overextended. Consequently, the process dragged on interminably without delivering any substantive benefit only mounting fees and frustration.In summary, this experience was a travesty of fairness. This is an individual who should never be entrusted with decisions that materially impact people’s lives. The American Arbitration Association ought to be profoundly ashamed to continue assigning cases to someone who either fails to understand the gravity of the role or, worse yet, understands it all too well and exploits it for personal gain.
July 20 · R Starett
I respectfully submit that the attorney in question is staggeringly unqualified or else willfully and egregiously biased. Either way, the outcome is the same: dangerous, profoundly damaging, and wholly unacceptable. I would strongly caution any party considering his services against doing so in any case where fairness, legal accuracy, or a proper understanding of the subject matter is expected or required.This glaring failure by an arbitrator with such an extensive tenure (at least 17 years as an arbitrator with the AAA as stated in his self-professed unverifiable experience) only underscores the American Arbitration Association’s apparent disregard for properly vetting individuals entrusted to deliver justice in their name—especially given that there is no mechanism to complain.He persistently misapplied the terms of the contract, repeatedly misconstrued fundamental legal principles, and demonstrated a startling lack of comprehension regarding the core issues at hand. Indeed, there were occasions when his rulings descended into such bewildering absurdity that I was compelled to question whether he was simply unfit for the position or if he was deliberately disregarding facts to reach a preordained conclusion.Either explanation is deeply troubling. If mere incompetence is at play, it raises grave concerns about the adequacy of the hiring organization. If, on the other hand, intentional bias informs his conduct, then we face an even graver problem: a system wherein he plainly favors the party with the deepest pockets and consciously acts to protect those interests. This is not neutrality but self-preservation masquerading as justice.He allowed one side flagrantly ignore deadlines and commit perjury repeatedly with impunity. Meanwhile, despite presenting facts, we were repeatedly dismissed without adequate explanation. It was unmistakably clear whose interests he sought to protect.Moreover, during the course of arbitration, it became painfully evident that he was managing multiple matters simultaneously, without meaningful oversight or accountability. This raises serious doubts as to the degree of care and diligence he afforded to any individual case when so overextended. Consequently, the process dragged on interminably without delivering any substantive benefit only mounting fees and frustration.In summary, this experience was a travesty of fairness. This is an individual who should never be entrusted with decisions that materially impact people’s lives. The American Arbitration Association ought to be profoundly ashamed to continue assigning cases to someone who either fails to understand the gravity of the role or, worse yet, understands it all too well and exploits it for personal gain.
July 20 · R Starett