Valter H. Must, Esq.

Valter H. Must, Esq. Introduce

When seeking legal representation, especially in a trial setting, it is important to find an attorney with a deep understanding of courtroom procedures and a proven record of navigating the legal system. For residents of New Jersey, and particularly those in Toms River, Valter H. Must, Esq. is a legal professional whose background includes a wide range of experience, including time spent serving as a judge. This unique perspective provides him with a comprehensive view of legal proceedings from all sides. As a trial attorney, he focuses on advocating for his clients within the courtroom framework, drawing upon his years of experience. The public record and commentary on his professional conduct, however, also provide a nuanced view of his demeanor and approach to justice. This article aims to provide a clear and factual overview of Valter H. Must, Esq.'s practice, his professional history, his office location and features, and the nature of the services he provides, so that local users can make an informed choice when considering legal representation in Ocean County.

The office of Valter H. Must, Esq. is situated at 9 Robbins St, Toms River, NJ 08753, USA. This location is conveniently positioned in Toms River, making it readily accessible for clients throughout the region. Robbins Street is a well-established area within the town, and the office's location is easy to find for those traveling by car. A key consideration for anyone seeking legal services is the accessibility of the office, and this practice has taken measures to accommodate clients with mobility challenges. The office is equipped with a wheelchair accessible entrance, a wheelchair accessible parking lot, and a wheelchair accessible restroom. These features are designed to ensure that clients can comfortably and safely access the premises to discuss their legal matters without physical barriers. Furthermore, the office operates on a planning basis, as appointments are recommended. This policy helps to ensure that Mr. Must can dedicate the necessary time and attention to each client, providing a more focused and effective consultation.

As a trial attorney, Valter H. Must, Esq. is involved in legal proceedings that extend to the courtroom. While specific service areas are not detailed in the provided information, the designation of "Trial attorney" signifies a focus on litigation. A trial attorney is a legal professional who represents clients in court, preparing and presenting cases before a judge and jury. The role requires a comprehensive understanding of legal strategy, evidence presentation, and courtroom decorum. This professional can handle a variety of legal disputes that may go to trial, which could include but are not limited to:

Civil Litigation: Representing individuals or entities in non-criminal disputes, such as contract disputes, property issues, or other legal conflicts that may require resolution in a courtroom setting.
Commercial Litigation: Handling legal disputes that arise in the business world, including partnership disagreements, breaches of contract, and other commercial conflicts.
Family Law: Potentially representing clients in complex family matters such as divorce or custody battles that proceed to trial.
Criminal Defense: Providing legal representation for those accused of crimes, defending their rights and presenting their case in a court of law.
Personal Injury Litigation: Representing individuals who have been injured due to negligence, seeking damages through a lawsuit that may lead to a trial.

The professional features of Valter H. Must, Esq. can be understood through his public record and the characteristics of his office. While the provided reviews speak to a specific aspect of his professional life, other factual information is available.

Professional Experience: The professional background of Valter H. Must, Esq. includes service as a judge. This experience is highly significant as it provides him with a unique perspective on legal proceedings from the judicial side of the bench, a perspective that is rare among practicing attorneys.
Accessibility: The office is designed with physical accessibility in mind, offering a wheelchair accessible entrance, parking lot, and restroom. This demonstrates a commitment to making legal services available to clients with physical limitations.
Professional Commentary: Public commentary on his professional conduct, specifically during his time as a judge, has been critical. Reviews from a self-described "very experienced litigant" described his courtroom demeanor as "unprofessional," citing instances of him allegedly failing to read case materials, refusing to allow a litigant to speak, and using insulting language. These reviews also mention the intention to file a formal complaint with the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC).
Office Planning: The recommendation for appointments is a feature that suggests a structured and organized approach to client management, designed to ensure that each client receives a dedicated block of time for their consultation.

To contact Valter H. Must, Esq. and inquire about legal services, you can use the following information:

Address: 9 Robbins St, Toms River, NJ 08753, USA

Phone: (732) 797-1600

Mobile Phone: +1 732-797-1600

For those in New Jersey seeking a trial attorney, the choice of a legal professional is a critical one that requires careful consideration of all available information. Valter H. Must, Esq. presents as a professional with significant experience in the legal system, having served in the capacity of both an attorney and a judge. This dual perspective is an uncommon and potentially valuable asset in trial work. However, any decision must also weigh the public commentary on his professional conduct. The reviews provided, while pertaining to his time as a judge, describe a demeanor that some may find concerning, including allegations of a lack of preparation, rudeness, and insensitivity. It is important for potential clients to consider this feedback as part of a larger professional profile. As a factual matter, his office provides excellent physical accessibility, which is a key consideration for many. Ultimately, what is worth choosing is a legal professional who not only possesses the necessary skills but also the temperament and client-centric approach that aligns with your specific needs. The public record on Valter H. Must, Esq. offers both a picture of extensive experience and a cautionary note on his demeanor, and it is up to the individual to decide how to balance these aspects when making a choice for legal representation.

Valter H. Must, Esq. Details

Accessibility
Wheelchair accessible entrance
Wheelchair accessible parking lot
Wheelchair accessible restroom

Amenities
Restroom

Planning
Appointments recommended

Valter H. Must, Esq. Photos

No photos available at the moment.

Valter H. Must, Esq. Location

New Jersey Ocean County Toms River Toms River Robbins Street

9 Robbins St, Toms River, NJ 08753, USA

Valter H. Must, Esq. Reviews

An average rating of ★1.6 from 7 user reviews.

judge

★ 5★ 4★ 3★ 2★ 1

I agree with the other 3 existing reviews, this man is a terrible judge (and I know what I am taking about, as I am a very experienced litigant).I had the displeasure of appearing at a motion hearing before this judge for the first time on Oct 20, 2023 via Zoom. It was clear that he did not read the motion papers at all (i.e. neither my opposition, nor even defense counsel's moving papers). He was completely unaware of the basis for the motion, which defense counsel had to spoon feed to this judge during oral argument.He then not only refused to let me explain the basis for my opposition before jumping to the incorrect conclusion (i.e he cut me off after only the first 2 sentences out of my mouth), he further was completely unprofessional in how he spoke to me. That is, he mocked the little bit that I was allowed to say, and then insulted me. When I tried to explain further, he told me to "shut up". Never in over 3 decades of my courtroom experiences (i.e. over 3 dozen cases and literally hundreds of court proceedings), has any other judge spoken to me in such an unprofessional manner. Then when I tried to explain the hardship that his unfair ruling would cause me, he again cut me off and callously refused to even hear what I had to say.Other reviewers have said that they had intended to file a complaint against this judge. I don't know if they ever went through with it or not, but based on my past experiences with the ACJC, they probably won't do anything unless and until dozens and dzens of more litigants come forward and file their complaints, as I intend to do now.
October 23 · Steve DAgostino
I agree with the other 3 existing reviews, this man is a terrible judge (and I know what I am taking about, as I am a very experienced litigant).I had the displeasure of appearing at a motion hearing before this judge for the first time on Oct 20, 2023 via Zoom. It was clear that he did not read the motion papers at all (i.e. neither my opposition, nor even defense counsel's moving papers). He was completely unaware of the basis for the motion, which defense counsel had to spoon feed to this judge during oral argument.He then not only refused to let me explain the basis for my opposition before jumping to the incorrect conclusion (i.e he cut me off after only the first 2 sentences out of my mouth), he further was completely unprofessional in how he spoke to me. That is, he mocked the little bit that I was allowed to say, and then insulted me. When I tried to explain further, he told me to "shut up". Never in over 3 decades of my courtroom experiences (i.e. over 3 dozen cases and literally hundreds of court proceedings), has any other judge spoken to me in such an unprofessional manner. Then when I tried to explain the hardship that his unfair ruling would cause me, he again cut me off and callously refused to even hear what I had to say.Other reviewers have said that they had intended to file a complaint against this judge. I don't know if they ever went through with it or not, but based on my past experiences with the ACJC, they probably won't do anything unless and until dozens and dzens of more litigants come forward and file their complaints, as I intend to do now.
October 23 · Steve DAgostino
Partial judge. I am surprised that in the 21st century he is allowed in the courts. Very narcistic with no conscience. He seemed to have a significant relationship with a female lawyer. I think further inquiries about his behaviors are indicated at this time. He doesn't bother looking at any evidence. His involvement with this female lawyer was enough to make a decision at the start of the case. I am sure that if his actions would be investigated, as they should be, it would cause many to loose faith in the court system in Ocean County NJ.A newspaper editor reached out to me, as she heard about my case. (I assumed other cases with this judge as well, but I am not sure.) I think she may have something to unravel.
April 10 · Chaya Rosmarin
Partial judge. I am surprised that in the 21st century he is allowed in the courts. Very narcistic with no conscience. He seemed to have a significant relationship with a female lawyer. I think further inquiries about his behaviors are indicated at this time. He doesn't bother looking at any evidence. His involvement with this female lawyer was enough to make a decision at the start of the case. I am sure that if his actions would be investigated, as they should be, it would cause many to loose faith in the court system in Ocean County NJ.A newspaper editor reached out to me, as she heard about my case. (I assumed other cases with this judge as well, but I am not sure.) I think she may have something to unravel.
April 10 · Chaya Rosmarin
If I could I’d give negative stars. I completely agree with all of the reviewers. He doesn’t read facts or information or anything you give him. He’s lazy, incompetent, very pretentious and has no problem ruining someone’s life and mental health cause of it.I would love for him to be removed from that high horse he thinks he belongs on and get back down where he belongs, perhaps he could use some type of educational counseling to learn how to deal with family law.I’m sure I’m not the only person that was treated unfairly and can honestly say there is no fair justice or understanding to any situation. He just wants to clear his calendar and screw over the next contestant on the @“&$ show he entertains. Yea nj is not a father state but us fathers do need to pay and shut up as we fall in line for what seems like child support being more of a business.Call child support’s number ask yourself why are the defendants or people who pay referred to as customers?I’d say to all judges “don’t judge lest ye be judged yourself”!!!
February 03 · J
If I could I’d give negative stars. I completely agree with all of the reviewers. He doesn’t read facts or information or anything you give him. He’s lazy, incompetent, very pretentious and has no problem ruining someone’s life and mental health cause of it.I would love for him to be removed from that high horse he thinks he belongs on and get back down where he belongs, perhaps he could use some type of educational counseling to learn how to deal with family law.I’m sure I’m not the only person that was treated unfairly and can honestly say there is no fair justice or understanding to any situation. He just wants to clear his calendar and screw over the next contestant on the @“&$ show he entertains. Yea nj is not a father state but us fathers do need to pay and shut up as we fall in line for what seems like child support being more of a business.Call child support’s number ask yourself why are the defendants or people who pay referred to as customers?I’d say to all judges “don’t judge lest ye be judged yourself”!!!
February 03 · J
This attorney has been made a judge In Ocean County family division nobody with his temperament and lack of discretion should be made a judge. I will be filing a complaint against him. I would not be surprised if I’m not the only one . On the record he compard me to another litigant from another case completely inappropriate and has a predisposed hatred to anybody wanting to represent themselves.
July 17 · Ken Alexander
This attorney has been made a judge In Ocean County family division nobody with his temperament and lack of discretion should be made a judge. I will be filing a complaint against him. I would not be surprised if I’m not the only one . On the record he compard me to another litigant from another case completely inappropriate and has a predisposed hatred to anybody wanting to represent themselves.
July 17 · Ken Alexander
Refuses to follow state guidelines and makes up his own biased rules and then threatens you if you seek justice for unfairness. This judge only favors women even if they are the guilty party. If you are a man, change your venue. You WILL NOT have a fair court room.
December 18 · Sandra Formoso
Refuses to follow state guidelines and makes up his own biased rules and then threatens you if you seek justice for unfairness. This judge only favors women even if they are the guilty party. If you are a man, change your venue. You WILL NOT have a fair court room.
December 18 · Sandra Formoso