Susan C. Over, P.C.: Your Family Law Attorney in Wilmington, DE

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law Introduce

Navigating the complexities of family law can be an emotionally and legally challenging journey. Whether you are contemplating divorce, fighting for child custody, or seeking to protect your rights as a parent, having a knowledgeable and compassionate attorney is not just a convenience—it is a necessity. For residents of Wilmington, Delaware, and the surrounding communities, Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law, stands as a dedicated and experienced legal resource. With a practice focused exclusively on family law, she provides expert guidance and steadfast advocacy during some of life's most difficult moments. The firm's commitment is to offer not just legal solutions, but also the personal support and straightforward advice that clients need to move forward with confidence.

The philosophy of Susan C. Over, P.C., is built on a foundation of honesty and direct communication. As a client testimonial suggests, she is known for her ability to "shoot it straight" and be honest with her clients, which is an invaluable quality when dealing with the sensitive nature of family legal matters. This transparent approach builds a strong sense of trust, allowing clients to make informed decisions without any sugar-coating. Her practice is also highlighted for its strong advocacy, particularly for fathers' rights, showing a deep commitment to ensuring fair and equitable outcomes for all parties involved. This comprehensive and empathetic approach sets her apart in the Wilmington legal community, making her a trusted partner for those facing family disputes.

This article is designed to provide a thorough overview of the services and values that define Susan C. Over, P.C. We will explore the firm's central location, its wide array of specialized family law services, and the key features that make it a top choice for those in need of legal assistance. Her practice is a clear reflection of her mission: to provide personalized, professional, and effective legal representation to protect the rights and futures of her clients and their families.

The office of Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law, is centrally located at 300 N Market St #205, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA. This address places the firm in the heart of downtown Wilmington, making it a convenient and accessible location for clients throughout New Castle County and beyond. The area is well-connected by major roads and is easily reachable from different parts of the city and surrounding suburbs. For those who rely on public transportation, the office is situated within close proximity to various bus routes, offering a hassle-free option for meetings and consultations.

Furthermore, the firm takes steps to ensure accessibility for all clients. The facility includes a wheelchair-accessible parking lot, which is a crucial feature that simplifies the arrival process for individuals with mobility challenges. This thoughtful amenity, along with the availability of a restroom, helps to create a comfortable and welcoming environment, allowing clients to focus on their legal matters without the added stress of logistical concerns. The commitment to these practical details demonstrates a dedication to client care that goes beyond legal representation.

Susan C. Over, P.C., is an attorney with a singular focus on family law. This specialization allows for a deep and nuanced understanding of the complexities and sensitivities involved in such cases. The services offered are extensive and cover a wide range of family-related legal issues.

Divorce and Separation: This includes a full spectrum of services, from handling simple and uncontested divorces to managing complex and contested cases. The firm also assists with high-net-worth divorces, ensuring the equitable division of assets and protecting the financial interests of clients.
Child Custody and Visitation: A primary area of expertise is guiding clients through child custody disputes, helping to create and modify parenting plans, and addressing issues like child relocation. The firm is particularly recognized for its advocacy for fathers' rights, a crucial aspect of family law that ensures both parents have a voice.
Child Support and Alimony: This includes securing, modifying, or enforcing child support orders and handling spousal support (alimony) disputes. The firm works to ensure that financial arrangements are fair and adhere to Delaware law.
Paternity and Adoption: They provide legal assistance for establishing paternity, as well as handling various adoption cases, including stepchild and stepparent adoptions, helping to formalize and protect new family bonds.
Agreements and Protections: The firm drafts and negotiates legal agreements such as prenuptial and separation agreements, providing clients with a clear and legally sound framework for their relationships and assets.
Appeals and Enforcement: For those who need to challenge a court decision or enforce an existing order, the firm offers legal representation for appeals and for enforcing family court orders and agreements.

The firm's strengths and distinguishing features are evident not only in the scope of its services but also in the feedback from satisfied clients.

Strong Advocacy for Fathers' Rights: A key highlight, as mentioned in a client review, is the firm's dedication to advocating for fathers. This specialized focus ensures that male clients are not disadvantaged in family court and receive fair consideration in custody and other family matters.
Honest and Direct Communication: Clients appreciate Susan C. Over's straightforward approach. Her commitment to being "honest" and shooting "it straight" means clients receive realistic expectations and clear, no-nonsense advice, which is vital for making sound legal decisions.
Specialized Family Law Focus: By concentrating exclusively on family law, the firm has developed a deep and comprehensive expertise in this field. This specialization ensures that clients are represented by an attorney who is fully immersed in the nuances of Delaware family court procedures and statutes.
Personalized and Compassionate Service: While the firm is aggressive in its advocacy, it also handles cases with sensitivity and understanding. This balance of tenacity and compassion provides clients with a supportive environment during a trying time.
Accessibility Features: The presence of a wheelchair-accessible parking lot and a restroom demonstrates a commitment to serving all members of the community, ensuring that the firm's services are available to everyone who needs them.

To get in touch with Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law, you can use the following information. The office is located at 300 N Market St #205, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA. You can contact them by phone at (302) 660-2913. Their mobile phone number, +1 302-660-2913, is also available for convenient communication. As appointments are recommended, calling ahead is the best way to ensure that you can schedule a consultation and have a dedicated discussion about your legal needs.

When you are looking for legal representation in a family law matter, the choice of an attorney can make all the difference. Susan C. Over, P.C., is a choice worth making for numerous reasons. The client testimonials, in particular, serve as a powerful endorsement of her effectiveness and her professional character. The review that states she "is the best for fathers right" and that she "will take care of you" provides a personal and highly trustworthy account of her dedication and success.

Her sole focus on family law ensures that her knowledge is not just broad, but also deep and current. She is fully aware of the latest precedents, procedural changes, and legal strategies that are crucial for a favorable outcome in Delaware family court. This level of specialization, combined with her commitment to honest and direct communication, provides a significant advantage. Rather than being told what you want to hear, you will receive a clear and realistic assessment of your situation, empowering you to make the best decisions for yourself and your family. For anyone in Wilmington facing a family law issue, choosing Susan C. Over means partnering with an attorney who is not only an expert in her field but also a compassionate and tireless advocate for her clients.

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law Services

Family Law Attorney
Adoption Case
Alimony Disputes
Appeals Attorney
Asset Division Lawyer
Asset Protection Attorney
Child Custody Attorney Divorce
Child Custody Lawyer
Child Relocation
Child Support Alimony
Child Support Child Support
Child Support Issues
Child Support Lawyer
Child Support Modification Attorney
Child Support Order Modified
Contested Divorce Attorney
Criminal Prosecution
Custody Change
Divorce Asset Protection
Divorce Custody Child Support
Divorce Disputes
Divorce Matters
Enforce Child Support
Family Court Orders
Family Law Cases
Family Law Firm Divorce
Family Law Matters
Father’s Rights Attorney
High Net Worth Divorce Lawyer
High- Asset Divorces
Parenting Plan
Prenuptial Agreements Attorney
Prenuptial Agreements Lawyer
Separation Agreements Attorney
Separation Agreements Lawyer
Simple Divorces
Spousal Support
Stepchild Adoption
Stepparent Adoption Attorney
Visitation Child Support

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law Details

Accessibility
Wheelchair accessible parking lot

Amenities
Restroom

Planning
Appointments recommended

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law Photos

No photos available at the moment.

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law Location

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law

Delaware New Castle County Wilmington North Market Street

300 N Market St #205, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA

Susan C. Over, P.C., Attorney at Law Reviews

An average rating of ★3.7 from 18 user reviews.

informativefathersopinionquestionschild custodydivorcecourt

★ 5★ 4★ 3★ 2★ 1

I hired her years ago and I can’t say anything but good she is the best for fathers right be honest shoot is straight and she will take care of you.
June 14 · Dillan Pollard
I hired her years ago and I can’t say anything but good she is the best for fathers right be honest shoot is straight and she will take care of you.
June 14 · Dillan Pollard
I wouldn't really recommend her just based off of my consult experience. My fiancé and I were trying to get our prenup drafted/edited. We had already spent hours creating this document together and agreed to everything. We just needed to have a lawyer look over it and make sure it was all legal and enforceable.The receptionist said that she would charge $225 for the consult which should have been half an hour and the hourly rate afterward would be $450 per hour. The receptionist also said that since we already did most of the work, Ms. Over would probably be able to get most of the details ironed out in the consult.This did not happen at all. I sent the 5ish page document over 24 hours prior to the consult. She said she hadn't been able to get a detailed look at it. So I was a a little upset with how unprepared she was when she asked me basic questions about what we had already included in the document. I will say that she at least was honest about the details of how the process should go, but the limited information given was not worth $225 in my opinion.She said that they require a retainer of $2000 and that any unused portion would be refunded. I wasn't really looking to set up a whole legal file and set up a divorce case. We just wanted to make sure the document was legal.Maybe I'm wrong, but it just seemed crazy to pay that much for someone to look over and edit a document that most of the legwork was already done on.
November 21 · Bud Lo
I wouldn't really recommend her just based off of my consult experience. My fiancé and I were trying to get our prenup drafted/edited. We had already spent hours creating this document together and agreed to everything. We just needed to have a lawyer look over it and make sure it was all legal and enforceable.The receptionist said that she would charge $225 for the consult which should have been half an hour and the hourly rate afterward would be $450 per hour. The receptionist also said that since we already did most of the work, Ms. Over would probably be able to get most of the details ironed out in the consult.This did not happen at all. I sent the 5ish page document over 24 hours prior to the consult. She said she hadn't been able to get a detailed look at it. So I was a a little upset with how unprepared she was when she asked me basic questions about what we had already included in the document. I will say that she at least was honest about the details of how the process should go, but the limited information given was not worth $225 in my opinion.She said that they require a retainer of $2000 and that any unused portion would be refunded. I wasn't really looking to set up a whole legal file and set up a divorce case. We just wanted to make sure the document was legal.Maybe I'm wrong, but it just seemed crazy to pay that much for someone to look over and edit a document that most of the legwork was already done on.
November 21 · Bud Lo
I was referred by a former paralegal of Susan Over to use her services. I have left 2 detailed messages in the last 5 months. I received 0 call backs. I also used her message app, Avvo and it was also ignored.
January 22 · Walter Charowsky
I was referred by a former paralegal of Susan Over to use her services. I have left 2 detailed messages in the last 5 months. I received 0 call backs. I also used her message app, Avvo and it was also ignored.
January 22 · Walter Charowsky
I started with Miss Over as a Pro bono case. So whatever she said went ahead with that. She keep on assuring me that she will take/ get her fees from my ex and won’t take anything from me. Me being very naive in this went ahead with her and her staff. Didn’t know that whether you contest or not, ultimately you will get divorced no matter what. She never informed me that. She gave me the impression that by contesting there is a chance that you will win and they will deny my ex’s divorce petition. That went on for two years. She had a game plan from the beginning to get as much money as she and her paralegal can from my ex and me. Paid more than 3000 just to file to get the attorney fees from my ex, which she didn’t win.. When she saw that my ex had money she kept on making me file all kinds of cases.. I was not worried because she assured me that she will take the fees from my ex. I have got only the same settlement as I got if I would have done self filing or may be with an attorney for a few thousand dollars. When I got the settlement from my ex, I paid almost or more than 25000 to her in total with the agreement that she will finish off what ever is going on with then. She not only didn’t finish it off, but asked for more money to represent me when bigger issue arise from my ex... She is a very sweet person and anybody will fall for her personality. But I won’t recommend her to even my enemies. She misled me and misinformed me to get money. Most of the time she is not prepared. She ask me questions when she come to the court for hearing. No calling and discussing about it in a previous day or nothing. Total waste of money!
June 11 · Vidhu Alex
I started with Miss Over as a Pro bono case. So whatever she said went ahead with that. She keep on assuring me that she will take/ get her fees from my ex and won’t take anything from me. Me being very naive in this went ahead with her and her staff. Didn’t know that whether you contest or not, ultimately you will get divorced no matter what. She never informed me that. She gave me the impression that by contesting there is a chance that you will win and they will deny my ex’s divorce petition. That went on for two years. She had a game plan from the beginning to get as much money as she and her paralegal can from my ex and me. Paid more than 3000 just to file to get the attorney fees from my ex, which she didn’t win.. When she saw that my ex had money she kept on making me file all kinds of cases.. I was not worried because she assured me that she will take the fees from my ex. I have got only the same settlement as I got if I would have done self filing or may be with an attorney for a few thousand dollars. When I got the settlement from my ex, I paid almost or more than 25000 to her in total with the agreement that she will finish off what ever is going on with then. She not only didn’t finish it off, but asked for more money to represent me when bigger issue arise from my ex... She is a very sweet person and anybody will fall for her personality. But I won’t recommend her to even my enemies. She misled me and misinformed me to get money. Most of the time she is not prepared. She ask me questions when she come to the court for hearing. No calling and discussing about it in a previous day or nothing. Total waste of money!
June 11 · Vidhu Alex
Hired Mrs. Over for a PFA case in 2021 when my now ex-wife filed a frivolous claim against me including a very serious allegation of “hitting her in the head with a balled up pair of socks”.During the course of her counsel, I do not feel as if I was very informed about the long lasting ramifications of entering a “plea deal” agreement in this instance. Whereas I thought nothing of agreeing to stay away from my ex-wife (since I did not want to be near her anyway), I should have fought every single line in this frivolous allegation in front of an open court. For example, when you enter an agreement in this type of case, you may as well be admitting guilt and it WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU IN ALL FUTURE PROCEEDINGS. Case in point, the Family Court judge for mg child custody case once in open court stated “There are very serious allegations of abuse” stemming only from this bogus PFA that I entered into an agreement of.This info would have been particularly useful to be made aware of when pursuing child custody of any kind (2.5 years later I am still fighting to see and/or talk to my two young children in any capacity.Mrs. Over laid out my case to me as such, “Since your daughter is also named in this PFA, you basically have two options…fight it and risk not being able to see your 3.5 year old daughter for a year if decided not in your favor or just agree not to go around your ex-wife for a year and visit your kids using supervised visits”. This seemed like a no brainer to me as I did not wish to go around my ex-wife as I in fact left her and also thought supervised visits would be good for my own protection as well.As it turns out…agreeing to any terms of a PFA (thought not in law but definitely in every other aspect) makes you guilty as charged and additionally by using any supervised visit agency you are also treated this same way.To reiterate here, my main complaint with Mrs. Over would be that she was in my opinion bad counsel in that I think she is much more aware of how the justice system works against divorced fathers and its intricacies in those regards.I think either through laziness or incompetence she did not iterate to me all of the potential long term pitfalls or otherwise that could come into play with each choice that was made in this instance. Law is Mrs. Overs area of expertise whereas I have never dealt with this specific thing before and should have done more research on my own to know which questions to ask I suppose?My apologies for the long review but I felt there needed to be some backstory so that if anyone else is reading this review in the same situation, you may pick up at least a wee bit of knowledge that neither this lady nor my next atty in same case thought pertinent to disclose.
February 22 · Matt
Hired Mrs. Over for a PFA case in 2021 when my now ex-wife filed a frivolous claim against me including a very serious allegation of “hitting her in the head with a balled up pair of socks”.During the course of her counsel, I do not feel as if I was very informed about the long lasting ramifications of entering a “plea deal” agreement in this instance. Whereas I thought nothing of agreeing to stay away from my ex-wife (since I did not want to be near her anyway), I should have fought every single line in this frivolous allegation in front of an open court. For example, when you enter an agreement in this type of case, you may as well be admitting guilt and it WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU IN ALL FUTURE PROCEEDINGS. Case in point, the Family Court judge for mg child custody case once in open court stated “There are very serious allegations of abuse” stemming only from this bogus PFA that I entered into an agreement of.This info would have been particularly useful to be made aware of when pursuing child custody of any kind (2.5 years later I am still fighting to see and/or talk to my two young children in any capacity.Mrs. Over laid out my case to me as such, “Since your daughter is also named in this PFA, you basically have two options…fight it and risk not being able to see your 3.5 year old daughter for a year if decided not in your favor or just agree not to go around your ex-wife for a year and visit your kids using supervised visits”. This seemed like a no brainer to me as I did not wish to go around my ex-wife as I in fact left her and also thought supervised visits would be good for my own protection as well.As it turns out…agreeing to any terms of a PFA (thought not in law but definitely in every other aspect) makes you guilty as charged and additionally by using any supervised visit agency you are also treated this same way.To reiterate here, my main complaint with Mrs. Over would be that she was in my opinion bad counsel in that I think she is much more aware of how the justice system works against divorced fathers and its intricacies in those regards.I think either through laziness or incompetence she did not iterate to me all of the potential long term pitfalls or otherwise that could come into play with each choice that was made in this instance. Law is Mrs. Overs area of expertise whereas I have never dealt with this specific thing before and should have done more research on my own to know which questions to ask I suppose?My apologies for the long review but I felt there needed to be some backstory so that if anyone else is reading this review in the same situation, you may pick up at least a wee bit of knowledge that neither this lady nor my next atty in same case thought pertinent to disclose.
February 22 · Matt